As teams draft learning goals and put together scopes and sequences, it can be useful to take stock of what’s happening around CITE at your institution. CITE team members have gathered data that we hope can help you in this process.

We describe the data we’ve gathered below, and some ways you might use it.

NOTE: To ensure data is shared in ways that respect CITE’s Ethical Data Uses Agreement, we’ve provided this data directly to CITE team leads. Please contact us if you are having access issues.

CITE Artifact Data

Team leads will receive a number of documents from CITE’s team that share the results of our analysis of 2023 CITE artifacts.

This document shares more about how we conducted our analysis, what’s included in them, and how to use (and not use) the data. In a nutshell, we sought to answer some descriptive questions (what computing and digital literacies did people integrate into artifacts, what tools did they use, what did faculty say about their implementations), as well as more subjective questions to help faculty and teams discover growth areas and strengths to build on.

We are providing you, as a team lead, with four resources:

1. SHAREABLE: A guide to help you contextualize our artifact feedback (also linked above)
2. SHAREABLE: A password protected Airtable view of team members’ high level artifact summaries: This is a more descriptive review. Feel free to download this view (as a .csv file), visualize it and share it however you like!
3. SHAREABLE: A PDF of team members’ high level artifact summaries. Also a descriptive review. This PDF displays the info from the file above in a more “user friendly” way. Feel free to share with your larger team, and use it to prompt conversations about the learning students are / might be expected to do!
4. FOR TEAM LEADS ONLY: A PDF including feedback and subjective reviews of team members’ artifacts. In addition to the descriptive reviews of artifacts, this PDF includes some subjective analyses around the clarity and internal alignment of the artifacts, as well as critical feedback and potential next steps for faculty members as they iterate their designs. We hope you use these to reflect on PD opportunities that might support team members and to understand points of strength and areas for growth. We recommend sharing these more subjective reviews with just other team leads who have signed our Ethical Uses of Data Agreement – unless you get permission from the faculty member to share their full artifact log more widely.

Feel free to let your colleagues know that they can request the full analysis of their own artifact from us if they’d like to see it.

NOTE: Only individuals registered on CITE central’s IRB protocol can conduct research with this data, and only on data of consenting individuals.

CITE Student Survey Data

Faculty participating in CITE were invited to administer a survey with students who experienced their artifacts – more information about the survey here.

Access the metadata of the survey here to help you interpret the results below.

NOTE: This data cannot be used for research purposes!

We are sharing three resources with team leads related to the survey:

1. SHAREABLE: A .csv file of CUNY-level aggregated student survey data (no identifiers). Use this dataset to see trends across CUNY. Can be shared widely with your teams.
2. SHAREABLE: A slide deck sharing some findings from an analysis of CUNY-wide data by CITE’s Central team. Feel free to share widely with your team.
3. FOR TEAM LEADS ONLY: A .csv file with the full set of data from students of faculty on your teams (with identifiers). This includes identifiers for students and faculty members. We recommend sharing this JUST with other team leads.